google-site-verification: googlef94ee99e1492dcb1.html
top of page
Templars Praying

THE TEMPLARS
 

IN SUFFOLK

THE TEMPLARS IN SUFFOLK

DUNWICH - Preceptory






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preceptory of Knights Templars from 1199-1312, and camera of the Hospitallers 1312-1540. Destroyed by coastal erosion.

Total: 6 marks, 5 shillings, and 5 pence.
In Dunwich.
By gift of the lord King: John de Cove holds one messuage and one windmill for half a mark, for all service
.

The Knights Templar and Hospitallers at Dunwich, Suffolk

The medieval port town of Dunwich once stood as one of the most important settlements on the Suffolk coast. Today, much of it has been lost to the sea through centuries of coastal erosion, but in the Middle Ages it was a thriving harbour town with religious houses, trade links, and significant monastic estates. Among these were the properties of the military orders, including a Templar preceptory that later passed to the Hospitallers.

Foundation and Royal Confirmation

A house or preceptory of the Knights Templar was established at Dunwich at an early date. Its existence is firmly attested during the reign of King John, who in the first year of his reign confirmed their holdings at Richdon in the town, along with associated liberties. This royal confirmation was later reinforced under Henry III in 1227, securing the Templars’ rights in the area.

By the mid-thirteenth century, the Dunwich Templar estate—referred to in records as bona Templariorum de Donewico—was valued at about £11 per year, indicating a modest but stable endowment.

The Templar Presence in Dunwich

The Dunwich establishment was dedicated in religious terms as Templum beatae Mariae et Johannis, and occasionally described as a hospital foundation—Hospitale beatae Mariae et S. Johannis vocatum Le Templum. This reflects the dual spiritual and charitable identity of the order, combining military discipline with religious service.

Documentary evidence suggests that members of the order were present on site. Following the suppression of the Templars in 1312, two named brethren—Robert de Spaunton and John Coffyn—were identified as being attached to the Dunwich house. In 1313, both were assigned penance duties, required to remain in monastic houses and observe a daily allowance of 4d per day each, under the oversight of the Bishop of Norwich.

Transfer to the Knights Hospitaller

After the suppression of the Templars across Europe, their properties were transferred to the Knights Hospitaller. The Dunwich holdings were no exception, passing into Hospitaller control in the early fourteenth century.

From this point, the estate continued as a religious and administrative centre under the Hospitallers. The former Templar church—often referred to in wills as “the Temple of Our Lady in Dunwich”—remained in use for religious purposes until the dissolution of the Hospitallers’ English properties in 1540.

The Temple Church and Estate

The church at Dunwich was described in the seventeenth century by antiquarian John Weever as a substantial and impressive building, with a vaulted nave and lead-covered aisles. It attracted indulgences and pilgrims, suggesting it remained an active devotional site for centuries.

The complex stood in Middlegate Street in Dunwich, approximately 55 rods from All Saints’ church. The estate itself was extensive, including houses, tenements, and agricultural lands in Dunwich and its surrounding district, with the manor extending into Middleton and Westleton. The manorial court, known as “Dunwich Temple Court,” was traditionally held on All Saints' Day.

Decline and Loss to the Sea

Following the dissolution of the Hospitallers in 1540, the revenues of the Temple manor passed to the Crown and were later granted out in the Elizabethan period, including to Thomas Andrews in 1562.

By this time, however, Dunwich itself was already in serious decline. Coastal erosion and storm damage had been steadily consuming the town for centuries, and large portions—including religious buildings, streets, and entire manorial estates—were gradually lost to the sea. As later antiquarian accounts and modern historical reconstructions note, Dunwich’s harbour, churches, and even monastic precincts eventually collapsed into the North Sea, leaving only fragments of the once-important medieval settlement on land.

Legacy

Although the physical site of the Templar and Hospitaller house at Dunwich has been lost, its documentary record preserves the memory of a significant religious and administrative centre. It reflects the broader story of the military orders in England: royal patronage under kings such as John and Henry III, transition from Templar to Hospitaller control, and eventual dissolution under Henry VIII.

Today, the story of the Dunwich preceptory survives as part of the wider history of Dunwich—a town that once stood at the heart of medieval coastal Suffolk, before the sea claimed much of its past.

GISLINGHAM - Manor

 

Gislingham, Suffolk: The Knights Templar and Knights Hospitaller Estate

Gislingham in north Suffolk preserves traces of one of the more intriguing small medieval religious sites in East Anglia: a minor preceptory of the Knights Templar, later transferred to the Knights Hospitaller after the suppression of the Templars in 1309. Though no standing buildings survive today, documentary records, place-name evidence, and earthwork traces suggest the site once formed a compact rural monastic farmstead.

The Knights Templar at Gislingham - Foundation and early history

The Gislingham Templar site was founded before 1222, when Brother Alan Mantel is recorded as master. It formed part of the rapid expansion of Templar estates in England during the late 12th and early 13th centuries.

The preceptory is believed to have originated from a donated rural holding within the Gislingham manor landscape, likely given by a local knightly or landholding family, as was typical for Templar foundations in Suffolk.

Who gifted it?

No surviving charter names the donor, but the most probable sources are:

  • a local Suffolk knightly family

  • or a minor lord connected to nearby estates such as Mellis or Rickinghall

The donation would likely have included:

  • a small farmstead or manorial holding

  • surrounding strips of arable land

  • rights to local rents or pasture

 In short, it was almost certainly a piecemeal aristocratic or gentry donation rather than a royal grant.

What the Templars held

The Gislingham preceptory was not a fortress but a small rural estate (camera/preceptory farm).

It likely included:

  • a timber hall or administrative house

  • agricultural buildings (barns, byres, storage)

  • enclosed yard or precinct

  • surrounding farmland worked by tenants or labourers

A possible moated enclosure (~60 ft square/circular) has been identified through historic mapping and field observation, suggesting a defined precinct typical of Templar estate organisation.

The archaeological site today

Modern investigation indicates:

  • location east of Gislingham village near Gislingham Farm / Lady Margaret’s Farm

  • possible survival of a waterlogged ditch or infilled moat

  • no standing structures remain

  • field systems and drainage have heavily altered the earthworks

The original moated enclosure is now only faintly visible or entirely obscured due to:

  • centuries of ploughing

  • silting of ditches

  • agricultural drainage works

CAVENHAM (Togrind) - Mill Site

 

The Knights Templar at Cavenham, Suffolk

Cavenham, on the River Lark in Suffolk, formed part of the Knights Templar’s wider East Anglian estate network. Unlike major Templar preceptories, the evidence for Cavenham points not to a large commandery, but to valuable mill rights and income connected with the river landscape between Cavenham, Twygrynd and Tuddenham.

The clearest medieval record comes from the early 14th century, after the arrest of the Templars in England. In 1308–1309, an inquisition of Templar rents and property recorded mills at Cavenham called Twygrynd. In 1311, it was noted that the Preceptor of Cavenham had been responsible for a payment of 5s. 11d. to the Priory of Stoke by Clare from the mills in Cavenham and Twygrynd. This shows that the Templars held income-producing mill property here, probably linked to the established watermill economy of the River Lark.

The donor of the Cavenham mill interests is not securely named in the surviving summary evidence. The wider lordship of Cavenham had strong links with the Clare family, and the nearby ecclesiastical interests of Stoke by Clare were also tied to Clare patronage. However, it is safest to say that the Templars’ exact benefactor at Cavenham remains uncertain unless further charter evidence can be identified.

The reference to a “Preceptor of Cavenham” is important, but it does not necessarily mean that a large community of Templar knights lived in the village. By the time of the 1308 arrest, officials found few, if any, resident Templars in Norfolk and Suffolk. Cavenham was probably administered as an estate asset, with the mills operated by local millers, tenants and workers under Templar authority.

Today, no standing building can be securely identified as a Templar structure. However, the historic mill landscape remains significant. The existing Mill House, standing on a leat from the River Lark and overlooking St Andrew’s Church, may preserve the memory and location of Cavenham’s medieval mill economy. While the present building is likely later in date, its position is highly suggestive of continuity from the watermill site associated with the medieval estate.

Cavenham’s Templar story is therefore one of landscape, waterpower and income rather than surviving military architecture. The Order’s presence here was practical and economic: mills, rents and river-side resources helping to support the wider religious and military work of the Knights Templar.

RICKINGHALE (Rickinghall) 

DINGLE - Chapel


 

The Knights Templar Chapel at Dingle, Suffolk

Dingle was a small medieval coastal landscape north of Dunwich, lying in the low-lying marsh and valley area between Dunwich and Walberswick, within the wider Westleton district of Suffolk. Although often discussed alongside the Templars’ better-known holding at Dunwich, Dingle appears to have had its own chapel belonging to the Order.

The clearest record comes from the post-suppression inventory of former Templar estates in Norfolk and Suffolk, made in 1311. This document records “the Temple and the chapels of Dunwich and Dingle”, showing that Dingle was not simply a field-name or marshland holding, but had a recognised religious site attached to the Templar estate. The wording suggests that Dingle possessed a chapel distinct from the Templar chapel or house at Dunwich.

The chapel was probably a small dependent chapel serving the Templars’ local estate, tenants, or agricultural workers in the Dingle area. The Templars are also known to have received small tithes at Dingle and Dunwich, supporting the idea that their presence here included both landholding and ecclesiastical income.

The exact site of the chapel has not yet been securely identified. Dingle is now represented broadly by Dingle Marshes, a coastal wetland landscape north of Dunwich. LiDAR imagery in the area shows several earthworks, including a possible trackway or boundary recorded by the Suffolk Historic Environment Record as DUN 028, centred around TM 4757 7219. Nearby rectangular and circular features are visible in the marshland, but neither can yet be confidently identified as the chapel. The rectangular feature is perhaps the most interesting for further field observation, though it may equally represent a later enclosure, drainage feature, marsh platform, or coastal structure.

Today, there are no confirmed standing remains of the Templar chapel at Dingle. Its site may have been lost through coastal change, flooding, marsh formation, or later land use. Nevertheless, the medieval record is important: it shows that the Knights Templar maintained a chapel at Dingle, separate from their better-known Dunwich holding, within one of Suffolk’s most vulnerable and changing medieval coastal landscapes.

BERGHOLT
 

Bergholt

Likewise, the same John delivered to the said Simon the manor of the Temple at Bergholt, with its appurtenances, together with one pond of water.

Likewise, £4 14s. 3d. in rent, to be collected at the four terms of the year.

Likewise, in the county of Essex, 5s. 9d. in rent from various tenants belonging to the said manor.

Likewise, there are there, in the manor of Nicholas the parson, by commission of the lord King, 16 acres of land, with one house built upon it, reasonably well roofed.

In witness of this matter, the seals of the parties are alternately appended.

Notes

This entry shows that the Templar holding at Bergholt was a modest manor with rents, a pond or fishpond, and a small landholding of 16 acres with a serviceable house. The reference to “Nicholas the parson” suggests that part of the property was situated within, or associated with, the manor of a cleric named Nicholas, rather than necessarily being the whole Templar manor itself.

Knights Templar

TEMPLAR FIGURES AT SUFFOLK

Suffolk & the Templars: Learn Who Shared Their Chapter of History Here

Click Here to Learn More

Brother Alan Mantel - Preceptor Gislingham 1222-1226

Brother Thomas de Stamford - Preceptor Gislingham 1305

Sir William de Goldingham - Preceptor Gislingham C1244

Robert de Spaunton - Dunwich

John Coffyn - Dunwich

Let’s Work Together

Get in touch so we can start working together.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Threads
  • Instagram

© 2022 by The Templars UK. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page